So you open up your browser and hop over to Google. You type in something like:
“Who has the quickest mobile broadband?“
3 internet sites that look very intimate pop up saying stuff like:
“BroadbandAccess Evolution Data Optimized (EV-DO) network from Verizon Wireless has been intensified with EV-DO Rev. A to deliver even rapidly and without delay info speeds and more outstanding efficiencies. Fast downloads – typical speeds of 600 Kbps to 1.4 Mbps. Fast uploads – typical speeds of 500-800 Kbps.”
“With a Sprint Mobile Broadband Card, you get intermediate download speeds of 600-1400 Kbps, peaking at 3.1 Mbps, and 350-500 Kbps intermediate upload speeds, peaking at 1.8 Mbps. Similar to DSL, and with regards to ten times more quickly than using a dial-up modem”
” AT&T offers the broadband speed and responsiveness of BroadbandConnect…the latest 3G gadgets provide typical download throughput of 700 kbps to 1.7 Mbps for downloads and 500 kbps to 1.2 Mbps for upload”
Ugh.
Just give it to me straight Doc. Speak English. How in the world is an individual supposed to figure out who’s the most immediate with this ‘can’t sue me’ lawyer-speak?
All the ranges seem to overlap. Even looking at the greatest or most complete or best possible speeds, Verizon and Sprint look identical…until, that is, you realize they are only theoretical. A best case scenario that’s not too optimistic.
It’s just like your speedometer’s range that goes from 0 mph to 120 mph. Just because 120 mph is on your dashboard doesn’t mean your rusty 16 year old Honda Civic Hatchback with the flashing engine check light is gonna make it.
The companies also know you can’t call them on it because ‘there are too numerous variables’. What were the road conditions like? How fast were you going? When last have you had a tune-up? What was the weather like? Do you know how some cell phone towers were in the area? How a good deal of satellites were positioned around you at the time? Or my personal favored ‘You were most likely roaming and we have no control over other networks’.
It’s like attempting to get fresh organic vegetables at McDonald’s. It’s just not gonna happen.
It just is what it is my friend.
The only way down to the nitty gritty and feast on the raw truth is to get out into the wild. Outside of my own testing, I draw on the experiences of others from ComputerWorld, Gizmodo and jkOnTheRun. I’ll give you a quick chronological recap of what happened with each:
ComputerWorld – Which 3G Network Is The Best? – 05/13/08
Location:
New York, New Jersey and Connecticut
Broadband Cards:
(AT&T) Sierra Wireless USBConnect 881, (Sprint) Novatel Wireless Ovation U727 and (Verizon) Sierra Wireless USB AirCard 595U
Result: AT&T had the most eminent greatest or most complete or best possible speed (1.6 Mbps), intermediate download speed (755 Kbps) and upload speed (484 Kbps)
Gizmodo – The Definitive Coast-to-Coast 3G Data Test – 12/17/08
Location:
Austin, Boston, Chicago, New York City, Portland, Raleigh-Durham, San Francisco and the Bay Area
Broadband Cards:
AT&T’s Sierra USBConnect 881, Sprint’s Sierra Wireless Compass 597 and Verizon Wireless’s Novatel USB727
Results: Sprint had the most eminent national intermediate download speed (1.4 Mbps) while AT&T (640 kbps) had the most eminent intermediate upload speed
jkOnTheRun – 3G SpeedTest: EV-DO vs. HSDPA in Phoenix – 12/27/08
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Broadband Cards: Verizon Wireless USB727, AT&T USB Quicksilver
Results: Verizon had the most eminent download speed (2.1 Mbps) and upload speed (744 Kbps)
So here we’ve got 3 dissimilar tests all showing somebody else as the winner. It’s scarcely surprising. Mobile broadband speeds do vary from place to place. The only way to get a clear winner is to test in multiple locations, take a couple averages and then see who comes out on top.
Since Gizmodo’s test was the most comprehensive, it’s reasonable to say it is likewise the most reliable. Sprint is kicking butt in the mobile broadband game. Even if you only compare the tests Gizmodo performed in New York City alongside the tests ComputerWorld ran in NYC, Sprint still beats AT&T in download and upload speed.
Sprint is distinctly the winner overall and provides severe contest in each location. If put together the fact that they’re the fastest, biggest mobile broadband network, you’ve got a double whammy.
It’s no wonder that Andy Abramson of Working Anywhere recommends Sprint. He spends when it comes to $900 per month testing mobile broadband and wireless internet related services. Seems like he might recognise a thing or two.
To beat a dead horse even further…
I’ve personally tested it over 1001 miles of highway at 70 miles per hour (New Orleans to Jacksonville and Tampa to Atlanta). I had my connection get dropped once…for 15 minutes total. That’s solid.
Now before we all get started bowing down to the aweinspiring network that is Sprint, ComputerWorld points out a great deal of things you ought to know:
“Using this technology may be a bit like being on a roller coaster. I found that I could be screaming along at 1.1Mbit/sec. only to have speeds slow to a creep at 20Kbit/sec. a moment later. That’s because, as with all cellular service, speed and reliability depend on a potpourri of conditions, such as how far you are from a cell tower, how a good deal of other users are connected in your vicinity and how much selective information they’re moving”.